[Background] In general, oral bioavailability
(F) and intestinal availability (FG, a ratio of drug escaping from
intestinal metabolism during absorption) are calculated by comparing the
clearances evaluated after intravenous and oral doses. Thus, an intravenous-dose study is
necessary for their evaluations, and moreover, inter-individual and inter-study
differences in the clearance may produce serious errors. In the previous study, we demonstrated
that FG is evaluable from changes in the AUC and plasma half life (t1/2)
associated with drug-drug interaction (DDI) for relatively well-absorbed
substrate drugs of CYP3A4 when its inhibitor is co-administered1). In this study, the application of this
method (DDI method) is extended to less absorbed drugs, and furthermore, to the
evaluation of F. [Method] Basic equations of the DDI method (Scheme) were
derived from the clearance theory. To
evaluate FG and F in the DDI method, the absorption ratio (FA)
needs to be approximated, but unnecessary to be very precise, hence it is named
tentative FA in the scheme.
Tentative FA was fixed previously1), but in this
study, approximated statistically or by the membrane permeability determined in vitro experiments. It was assumed that FG becomes
1.0 when strong inhibitors are co-administered (FG*). Extensive Monte-Carlo simulations were conducted
to check preciseness of the DDI method.
Furthermore, FG and F of approximately 60 drugs (mainly
substrates of CYP3A4) were evaluated based on literature information, and
compared with the observed values if available. [Results and Discussion] The simulation
study indicated that the modified DDI method provides reasonable estimation of
FG using tentative FA approximated statistically even for
poorly absorbed drugs (i.e. FA < 0.3). For evaluation of F, tentative FA
needs to be more precise; accordingly approximated by in vitro information such as the permeability determined in the Caco-2
system. Overall, F and FG
obtained by the DDI method were in excellent accord with those evaluated by
other methods using the systematic clearance after intravenous dose (Figure). Since evaluation of a DDI is frequently
carried out within a single study using the same subjects, it seemed that the DDI
method provides more stable evaluation compared with the conventional methods
in many situations. [Conclusion] The
DDI method was proposed as a robust technique for evaluation of FG,
and in addition, it may become an alternative method for evaluation of F when
an intravenous-dose study is unavailable.
Reference: 1) Tsukihashi et al., A
new calculation method of intestinal availability from pharmacokinetic changes
by drug-drug interaction, 25th JSSX Annual Meeting, 2010, Tokyo, Japan.
![[ Visit Client Website ]](images/banner.gif)